Many fans will agree, I’m sure, that bikinis & a little clothing on a beauty like Joyce is more intensely erotic than nudity! Why is this? An Anthropologist may argue from an evolutionary perspective suggesting our ‘Hunter Gatherer’ ancestors had far more body hair than we have today which covered vital organs protecting their bits due to realistic fears of losing them to a predator or natural object, floral or fauna! Let’s say their environment was definately more hostile with no supermarkets which meant they had to hunt & be hunted to survive!
It follows, especially since man, the mammal lost much of his body hair, that our ancestors were probably not always naked unless it were for rituals, social gatherings & intimacy; which brings me back to why a bikini is more attractive than nudity? Well, I think it’s 2 fold? Stoneage women weren’t dressed like Rachel Welch in 10,000BC but females probably wore a mock early bikini to prevent the cold, protect dignity & attract males by auto-suggestion meaning the sight of the bikini was the main attraction as there probably weren’t perfumes around. Too much clothing: heavy bear skins etc would have been a hindrance so I guess females had to strike the balance & be moderately naked.
Alas, there was born Earth’s 1st bikini? All the fascination & fetishes followed soon after & the sight of cloth around genitalia & nipples became a fundamental attractant & explains why I’m here today!
BIKINI SCIENCE!
Many fans will agree, I’m sure, that bikinis & a little clothing on a beauty like Joyce is more intensely erotic than nudity! Why is this? An Anthropologist may argue from an evolutionary perspective suggesting our ‘Hunter Gatherer’ ancestors had far more body hair than we have today which covered vital organs protecting their bits due to realistic fears of losing them to a predator or natural object, floral or fauna! Let’s say their environment was definately more hostile with no supermarkets which meant they had to hunt & be hunted to survive!
It follows, especially since man, the mammal lost much of his body hair, that our ancestors were probably not always naked unless it were for rituals, social gatherings & intimacy; which brings me back to why a bikini is more attractive than nudity? Well, I think it’s 2 fold? Stoneage women weren’t dressed like Rachel Welch in 10,000BC but females probably wore a mock early bikini to prevent the cold, protect dignity & attract males by auto-suggestion meaning the sight of the bikini was the main attraction as there probably weren’t perfumes around. Too much clothing: heavy bear skins etc would have been a hindrance so I guess females had to strike the balance & be moderately naked.
Alas, there was born Earth’s 1st bikini? All the fascination & fetishes followed soon after & the sight of cloth around genitalia & nipples became a fundamental attractant & explains why I’m here today!